Priority
Teams know what to close first.
Findings ordered by impact, exploitability, and operational risk.
Less debate, faster fixes
Authorized penetration tests
Find what is actually exploitable.
Active testing of approved web apps, APIs, infrastructure, or cloud scopes. Controlled, with PoCs and a retest path — so critical gaps get closed, not just listed.
ApprovalRoEWritten scope before the first active test.
EvidencePoCReproducible evidence, not score lists.
ClosureRetestCritical fixes are re-checked.
Pricingby scopeIn a scope meeting by goals and depth.
Outcomes
Not a vulnerability list — a repair decision.
Every relevant finding: impact in the approved scope, next action, measurable risk reduction.
Impact
Management sees the business context.
Single findings become an understandable attack chain with assets and effect.
Priorities are explainable
Closure
Retest makes improvement provable.
Critical fixes do not die in tickets — they are validated again.
Risk closed, not only documented
Approach
Active tests only with clear mandate, target, and risk.
Not a noisy technical run. Start with authorization, end with a decision: what is exploitable, how critical, what reduces risk fastest?
Pentest ControlAuthorized
No blind testing in production. Before start: targets, no-go areas, contacts, windows, rate limits, and stop criteria. Operations stay protected — and every result maps to scope. Often useful after CASP, when the test space is already sharpened outside-in.
Written approved scope Controlled active testing Reproducible evidence and retest
ScopeDomains, apps, APIs, IPs, or cloud resources with clear authorization.
MethodsBlack-, grey-, or white-box by goal, risk, and context.
Ops safetyContacts, escalation, emergency stop, and test window before the first packet.
What we do not doControlled validation · no blind scan
Rules of EngagementExploit pathEvidence chainRetest ready
No unauthorized testing
Start only after written scope approval.
No uncontrolled production tests
Stop rule, rate limits, and abort criteria are part of the rules of engagement.
No empty score lists
Every relevant finding: impact, evidence, recommended action.
Not a CASP substitute
Pentest validates actively in approved scope. CASP first shows what is already visible outside-in.
Coverage
What the test actually validates.
Attack paths that can be proven — and results engineering, IT, and management can use.
Scope & attack paths
Realistic test paths from architecture, assets, and objective.
Active validation
Web app, API, infrastructure, cloud, or mobile — controlled.
Impact assessment
Not only the weakness, but reachable effect in approved context.
Remediation & retest
Actions, priority, evidence, and a base for re-validation.
Deliverables
Four artifacts. Fixes and retest included.
Technical exploitability becomes priority, ownership, and re-validation. Close risk — do not only document it.
01
Rules of Engagement
Test space with targets, limits, windows, communication, rate limits, and stop criteria.
02
Attack-chain evidence
Reproducible findings: cause, path, evidence, impact, assets.
03
Management repair brief
Prioritized risks in plain language — business context and next step.
04
Retest backlog
Fix guidance, sequence, owner, and optional retest of critical findings.
Process
Four steps to retest.
Technical depth with operational control — from approval to re-validation.
- 01
Scope & RoE
Targets, authorization, window, contacts, and allowed methods in writing.
- 02
Recon & test plan
Prioritize attack paths; align high-risk checks first.
- 03
Active validation
Test approved targets in a controlled way; capture evidence continuously.
- 04
Report & retest
Priorities, evidence, measures, and a clear retest path.
Next step
Ready for an authorized pentest?
We start with scope, approval, and the purpose of the test. Price and depth follow goals — often after CASP.
Scope first, action after.
Clarify scope & RoENext step
Request scope meeting